Mechanical and thermal properties of eucalyptus fiber composites from blend between biodegradable poly(butylene succinate) and Recycled PET

Authors

  • Nattakarn Hongsriphan Department of Materials Science and Engineering,Faculty of Engineering and Industrial Technology,Silpakorn University,Nakhon Pathom https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5833-8990
  • Phoorinat Dangmanee Department of Materials Science and Engineering,Faculty of Engineering and Industrial Technology,Silpakorn University,Nakhon Pathom
  • Mookyada Mankrut Department of Materials Science and Engineering,Faculty of Engineering and Industrial Technology,Silpakorn University,Nakhon Pathom
  • Warunkarn Jantaraka Department of Materials Science and Engineering,Faculty of Engineering and Industrial Technology,Silpakorn University,Nakhon Pathom

Keywords:

Short fiber composite, Poly(butylene succinate), Recycled PET, Eucalyptus fibers, MPS silane

Abstract

The goal of this study was to enhance rigidity and to reduce cost of the PBS-based composites by blending with recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate) (r-PET) and Eucalyptus fibers. Prior compounding, Eucalyptus fibers were treated with alkali and γ-methacryloxypropyl trimethoxysilane (MPS) solution for compatibility improvement. PBS and r-PET were melt blended in a twin-screw extruder with the weight ratio of 95/5, 90/10, and 80/20 wt%, and compounded with MPS treated Eucalyptus fibers using fiber loading of 3, 5, and 7 wt% of composites. Samples were characterized by tensile test, notched Izod impact test, SEM, NMR, and DSC. It was found that r-PET increased rigidity of PBS matrix but reduced impact resistance. Glass transition temperature of PBS and r-PET shifted toward each other indicating compatibility between them via transesterification. Chemical shifts in NMR indicated chemical interaction between PBS matrix and MPS grafted on Eucalyptus fibers, which illustration of interaction was proposed. Blending PBS with r-PET and Eucalyptus fibers synergistically increased rigidity for the PBS matrix. Composites of PBS/r-PET 80/20 wt% blends with 7 wt% fiber presented Young’s modulus 67.3% higher than that of neat PBS. For impact property, it was found that it depended on r-PET content in the composites that the composites from PBS/r-PET 95/5 wt% blend was the best. SEM images revealed that there were fine particles of r-PET domains dispersed inside PBS matrix, and wetting of PBS on silane treated fibers was clearly obtained.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Xu J. and Guo B.-H. (2010). Poly(butylene succinate) and its copolymers: Research, development and industrialization, Bioyechnol J, 5: 1149–1163.

Nam T. H., Ogihara S., Nakatani H., Kobayashi S. and Song J. I. (2012). Mechanical and thermal properties and water absorption of jute fiber reinforced poly(butylene succinate) biodegradable composites, Adv Compos Mater, 21: 241- 258.

Feng Y.-H., Zhang D.-W., Qu J.-P., He H.- Z. and Xu B.-P. (2011). Rheological properties of sisal fiber/poly(butylene succinate) composites, Polym Test, 30: 124–130.

Frollini E., Bartolucci N., Sisti L. and Celli A. (2013). Poly(butylene succinate) reinforced with different lignocellulosic fibers, Ind Crop Prod, 45: 160–169.

Chen R.-y., Zou W., Zhang H.-c., Zhang G.- z., Yang Z.-t., Jin G. and Qu J.-p. (2015). Thermal behavior, dynamic mechanical properties and rheological properties of poly(butylene succinate) composites filled with nanometer calcium carbonate, Polym Test, 42: 160-167.

Ali F. B. and Mohan R. (2010). Thermal, mechanical, and rheological properties o f b i o d e g r a d a b l e p o l y b u t yl e n e s u c c i n a t e / c a r b o n n a n o t u b e s nanocomposites, Polym Composite, 31: 1309–1314.

Hongsriphan N., Popanna A., Arrtith Eksirinimit, Naneraksa P. and Soponsiriwat S. (2014). Mechanical properties of biodegradable poly(butylene succinate) blended with poly (ethylene terephthalate) recycle, ANTEC 2014.

Phua Y. J., Lau N. S., Sudesh K., Chow W. S. and Ishak Z.A.M. (2012). Biodegradability studies of poly(butylene succinate)/organomontmorillonite nanocomposites under controlled compost soil conditions: Effects of clay loading and compatibiliser, Polym Degrad Stabil, 97 : 1345-1354.

Runt J., Miley D. M., Zhang X., Gallagher K. P., McFeaters K. and Fishburn J. (1992). Crystallization of poly(butylene terephthalate) and its blends with polyarylate, Macromolecules, 25: 1929– 1934.

Sun S.-N., Cao X.-F., Li H.-Y., Xu F. and Sun R.-C. (2014). Structural characterization of residual hemicelluloses from hydrothermal pretreated Eucalyptus fiber, Int J Biol Macromol, 6: 158–164.

Redondo S. U. A., Radovanovic E., Goncalves M. C. and Yoshida I. V. P. (2002). Eucalyptus kraft pulp fibers as an alternative reinforcement of Silicone composites. I. Characterization and chemical modification of Eucalyptus fibers with organosilane coupling agent, J Appl Polym Sci, 85: 2573–2579.

Tham W. L., Chow W. S. and Ishak Z. A. M. (2010). The effect of 3-(trimethoxysilyl) propyl methacrylate on the mechanical, thermal, and morphological properties of poly(methylethacrylate)/hydroxyapatite composites, J Appl Polym Sci, 118: 218–228.

Arrieta M. P., López J., López D., Kenny J. M. and Peponi L. (2015). Development of flexible materials based on plasticized electrospun PLA – PHB blends : Structural, thermal, mechanical and disintegration properties, Eur Polym J, 73: 433–446.

Pawlak A., Morawiec J., Pazzagli F., Pracella M. and Galeski A. (2002). Recycling of Postconsumer Poly(ethylene terephthalate) and High-Density Polyethylene by Compatibilized Blending, J Appl Polym Sci, 86: 1473–1485.

Calcagno C. I. W., Mariani C. M., Teixeira S. R. and Mauler R. S. (2008). The role of the MMT on the morphology and mechanical properties of the PP/PET blends, Compos Sci Technol, 68: 2193–2200.

Thirunavukarasu K., Purushothaman S., Sridevi J., Aarthy M., Gowthaman M. K., Nakajima-Kambe T. and Kamini N.R. (2016). Degradation of poly(butylene succinate) and poly(butylene succinateco-butylene adipate) by a lipase from yeast Cryptococcus sp. grown on agroindustrial residues', Int Biodeter Biodegr, 110: 99-107.

Kuan C.-F., Ma C.-C. M., Kuan H.-C., Wu H.-L. and Liao Y.-M. (2006). Preparation and characterization of the novel watercrosslinked cellulose reinforced poly(butylenesuccinate) composites, Compos Sci Technol, 66: 2231–2241.

Chen J. and Wu D. (2014). Poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/Poly(butylene succinate) blend: Phase behavior and mechanical property control using its transesterification system as the compatibilizer, Mater Chem Phys, 148: 554-561.

Chen R., Zou W., Zhang H., Zhang G., Yang Z., Jin G., and Qu J. (2015). Thermal behavior, dynamic mechanical properties and rheological properties of poly(butylene succinate) composites filled with nanometer calcium carbonate, Polm Test, 42: 160-167.

Li J., Luo X. and Lin X. (2013). Preparation and characterization of hollow glass microsphere reinforced poly(butylene succinate) composites', Mater Des, 46: 902–909.

Downloads

Published

2017-06-30

How to Cite

[1]
N. Hongsriphan, P. . Dangmanee, M. Mankrut, and W. Jantaraka, “Mechanical and thermal properties of eucalyptus fiber composites from blend between biodegradable poly(butylene succinate) and Recycled PET”, J Met Mater Miner, vol. 27, no. 1, Jun. 2017.

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles