Ballistic performance of ceramic/S<sub>2</sub>-glass composite armor
Keywords:
V50 ballistic limit, Areal density, partial penetration, complete penetrationAbstract
Ceramic composite armor was initially developed during the Vietnam War for use as helicopter armor and personnel armor. The requirements for the armor were light weight and the capability to defeat small caliber armor piercing (AP) projectiles. Several different ceramics were developed and tested for this application. It was found that aluminum oxide (Al2O3), silicon carbide (SiC) and boron carbide (B4C) had the best combination of properties to meet the requirements. The long term goal of this research is to develop domestic knowledge, design and production capability of ceramic composite armors. In this present research, the relationship between the ballistic performance and mechanical properties of ceramic armor composites were investigated. The armor composite consisted of a 100x100 mm2 commercial monolithic ceramic front tile; i.e. sintered Al2O3, sintered SiC, or hot-pressed B4C bonded with an S2-glass reinforced polymer composite (GRPC) backing plate. The ballistic test was performed against 7.62 mm projectiles (M80 Ball) in the velocity range of 800-970 m/s. A linear correlation between the areal density of armor and the V50 results was illustrated. The V50 ballistic limit values for the Al2O3, SiC and B4C composite armors, calculated via U.S. Mil-Std-662F, were found to be 913 m/s, 869 m/s, and 829 m/s, respectively. High-speed photographic images captured during ballistic testing revealed the transition from dwell to penetration by the 7.62 mm projectiles. The complete penetration of all the armor composites was found to have occurred in approximately 200 microseconds. Furthermore, the relationship between the volume of the cone crack and mechanical properties were examined. The fracture toughness values of Al2O3, SiC, and B4C were 4, 4.6, and 2.9, respectively. The volume of the cone cracks formed on the ceramic front tile plates increased with an increase in the fracture toughness of the ceramic materials.Downloads
References
Wilkins, M.L., Honodel, C.A. and Swale, D. (1967). An approach to the study of light armour. Livermore : Lawrence Radiation Laboratory. UCRL-50284, June 1967.
Wilkins, M.L, Cline, C.F. and Honodel, C.A. (1969). Fourth progress report of light armour program. Livermore : Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, UCRL-50694, 1969.
Wilkins, M.L., Landingham, R.L. and Honodel, C.A. (1971). Fifth Progress Report of Light Armour Program. Livermore : Lawrence Radiation Laboratory. UCRL-50980, January 1971.
Cline, C.F.and Wilkins, M.L. (1969). The importance of material properties in ceramic armour. Proceedings of the ceramic armour technology symposium. (USA) : 13-18, January 1969.
Sadanandan, S. and Hetherington, J.G. (1997). Characterisation of ceramic/steel and ceramic/ aluminium armours subjected to oblique impact. Int. J. Impact Eng. 19 : 811-818.
Hetherington, J.G. (1992). The optimization of two component composite armours. Int. J. Impact Eng. 12 : 409-414.
Hetherington, J.G. and Rajagopalan, B.P. (1991). An investigation into the energy absorbed during ballistic perforation of composite armours. Int. J. Impact Eng. 11 : 33-40.
Horsfall, I. and Buckley, D. (1996). The effect of through-thickness cracks on the ballistic performance of ceramic armour systems. Int. J. Impact Eng. 18 : 309-318.
Edwards, M.R. (2000). Land-based military applications. In: Comprehensive composite materials, Vol. 6. New York: Pergamon: 681-699
Hazell, P.J., Fellows, N.A. and Hetherington, J.G. (1998). A note on the behind armour effects from perforated alumina/aluminium targets. Int. J. Impact Eng., 21: 589-595.
Gama, B.A., Bogetti, T.A., Fink, B.K., Mahfuz, H. and Gillespie, J.W. (1999). Modeling and Simulation of Dynamic behavior of EPDM rubber under stress wave loading. CD Proc. Math. & Comp. in Mech. Eng. ’99, Florida Keys, July 25-29, 1999.
Ranganath, S. and Subrahmanyam, J. Ballistic testing and evaluation of ceramic composites. Defence Metallurgical Research Laboratory, Kanchanbagh, Hyderabad, India.
Elperin, T., Ben-Dor, G., Dubinsky, A. and Frage, N. (2000). Optimization of two component ceramic armor for a given impact velocity. Theor. App. Frac. Mech. 33 : 185-190.
Elperin, T., Ben-Dor, G. and Dubinsky, A. (2000). The optimum arrangement of the plates in a Multi-Layered shield. Int. J. Solids Struc. 37 : 687-96.
Wang, B. and Lu, G. (2000). On The optimization of Two-Component plates against ballistic impact. J. Mat. Proc.Tech. 57 : 141-145.
Straburger, E. (2009). Ballistic testing of transparent armor ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 29 : 267-273.
Shi, J. and Grow, D. (2006). Composite effect of double constraints on the optimization of two component armor systems. Comp. Struc. 79 : 445-453.
Masayoshi, Y., Kiyoto, S., Takeshi, K. and Yasuhiro, T. (2010). Relationship between the cone crack and fracture mode in ceramics under high-velocity-projectile impact. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 118 : 903-908.
Wilkins, M.L. (1978). Mechanics of Penetration and Perforation.Int. J. Eng. Sci. 16 : 793–807.
Shockey, D.A., Marchand, A.H., Skaggs, S.R., Cort, G.E., Burket, M.W., and Parker, R. (1990). Failure phenomenology of ceramic targets and impacting rod. Int. J. Impact Eng. 9 : 263–75.
Sherman, D. and Brandon, D.G. (1997). The ballistic failure mechanisms and sequence in Semiinfinite supported alumina tiles. J. Mater. Res. 12 : 1335–43.
Sherman, D. and Ben-Shushan, T. (1998). Quasistatic impact damage in confined ceramic tiles. Int. J. Impact Eng. 21 : 245–65.
Frechette, V.D. and Cline, C.F. (1970). Fractography of ballistic tested ceramics. Acer. Bull. 49 : 994-997.
Eugene, M. (2010). Ballistic performance of armour ceramics: Influence of design and structure. Part 2. Ceram. Inter. 36 : 2103- 2115.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 Journal of Metals, Materials and Minerals
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.